- Workers' compensation. The injured worker claimed tissue damages, and the attorney wanted photos detailing the extent of injuries. We met the injured worker at their home, and took photos showing extensive bruising on the head, neck, face, hands, and legs. The photos were a key element in the claim for soft tissue injuries. Subsequently, the injured worker's claim was accepted.
- Motor vehicle accident. Following a multiple vehicle accident, we were contacted to work with an engineer to show damages to a vehicle. The original adjuster photos showed minor damage to the exterior of the client's vehicle; however, detailed photos of the underside of the vehicle, along with photos accurately showing overall "fit and finish" of body panels, interior and exterior, supported the engineer's findings of significant structural damage. The photographs, combined with the engineer's report, were provided as part of the demand package, resulting in a policy limits settlement before trial.
- Premises liability. A premises liability claim with significant personal injuries was filed against both a business operator and the property owner. Photographs were taken duplicating the lighting and conditions at the time of the incident, which were used to resolve the claim prior to litigation.
- Construction defect. A construction defect claim was filed against the original builder of a large commercial project. Over the course of six months, detailed photographs were taken of the original construction, tear-down of the buildings, and the work done by contractors and skilled trades in repairing the damages.
- Archival Conversion. An attorney preparing to close his practice contacted us regarding his closed files. We were able to schedule off-hours scanning of over 70,000 pages in closed files, dating back over 10 years. The average file prior to scanning was two 5" redwells, with accompanying binders, blueprints, x-rays, etc. Upon completion of scanning and burning of archive DVDs, his closed files filled 10 regular bankers boxes, one for each year of archived files. The attorney was able to close his off-site storage, and enjoyed significant savings versus paying for secure off-site storage for the required retention period.